Ah ah great Jihel ^^
I'm sorry for these inconveniences, I can send you a well calibrated one š
My products : https://phmodular.com/boutique/
Ah ah great Jihel ^^
I'm sorry for these inconveniences, I can send you a well calibrated one š
My products : https://phmodular.com/boutique/
I have a Pam's and it's nice but you can't change parameters easily without menu diving. You do have two CVs you can assign but it's still not "performable".
After starting out with a bunch of everything-and-the-kitchen-sync modules, I am slowly replacing those with singular function modules. Space in the case be damned.
The last module I added was an actual Turing Machine. :)
I bought one, but the silence is a bit saturated in the high frequencies.
Probably a calibration issue...
Loved it for random sequences etc but recently acquired a Pams New workout and a Malekko Voltage block. Also have Batumi 4x LFO and Disting mk 4 which between them can produce lot's of sequenced and random cv stuff. As I'm running out of space in my rack I am wondering if the Turing and the two expanders are worth keeping or pretty much redundant now. Am I missing something unique about it that the other stuff doesn't cover? Thanks for any advice.
Thatās what I usually do is tune to middle and have both octave up and down, because it is normalled you can have 3 octave span. In a single input. I often patch these into a gated switch to further drive melodic sequences.
Im producing Dark Ambient ,try to search for dark ambient or ambient that should give you some ideas
any more info on the game?
https://broken-form.bandcamp.com/
Got a Mantis Case for sale,PM Me
Thatās usually how I use it. I suppose you could tune to your preferred pitch on the center setting and have one octave up and one octave down for four different voices.
Wow, that's great! Can you say a bit more about how you're using Marbles? It isn't clear to me if it's generating a pattern for the pitches or rhythm or....?
-- asleepwheel
Itās doing both, sending triggers from the left side and pitches from the right side !
Itās sending two quantized (pentatonic major if I recall) pitches and two triggers for the enveloppes for the blades osc and the verbos CO in a locked sequence, sequence that I modify by turning the bias knob of marbles. The bass is not sequenced but changed by wiggling a Stages fader, from a quantized pentatonic scale.
I use Noise Engineeringās Quant Gemi for octave switching. Handy little module.
Wow thank you for all the kind words, I didnāt have the notifications! If youāre interested I have a SoundCloud where I put more elaborate songs (layers of modular recordings for instance).
Thanks,
Yes, noticed that.
Any suggestions? I was looking at the WMD Volt. Any other?
Thanks
Hello,
I'd like to know if, as users, we can add videos on the module description, and if it's allowed, how to proceed. Thank you !
Hello, the M303 is a very nice mpodule, if you plan to pair it with another VCO you'll need an octave switcher !
Talking of heat, I think the Rackbrute case I bought had a problem, it got really hot and smelled like burning plastic and made the room stink. This ended up going back to the supplier who fit a new Power supply and sent it back. I'd lost faith in it by this point so left it boxed up and sold it on.
I'd never had a problem with my TipTop uZeus (x2) or my subsequent KonstantLab Power, I even found some of my modules ran cooler when NOT in the Rackbrute.
Hopefully this was a one-off and you'll have a good experience with Arturia.
Enjoy your spare HP, don't rush to fill every last space, this is not like filling sticker books. Resist the urge to 'complete' your rack, its never complete so just relax.
Mat, a couple comments:
ā if you are looking at DPO vs Verbos Complex vs Furthrr, may as well also consider Instruo Csl and Mindphaser. I personally love the ācomplex OSCā setup which is very west coast and to me a big change from what I experienced with lots of prior VST exposure. In other words I find that setup a breath of fresh air. DPO sounds great to me; the dual primary routing is very good and it has a fat warm musical sound to me. CSL a lot of people love but to me it sounds a lot thinner than DPO. Anyways there are some very strong modules in this set and itās worth some good comparison and consideration. And whatever the spec sheets say, man DPO really sounds great to meā¦
ā from the thread above I have to mention FSS Makrow and ADDAC 306 which are basically macro controllers in modular. I have a hunch 1,2,3 of those might be a great fit with your overall setup.
Iāll have to check out your videos!
Cheers,
Nicholas
-- nickgreenberg
Hi Nicholas,
Interested to read your comments about the complex oscillators out there. It's a tricky choice, because whichever one I choose is going to have such a major effect on the eventual sound. I really need to find a shop somewhere which has them all so I can play with each of them and see which floats my boat I guess. I like the look of the FSS Makrow and ADDAC 306, which would be great for transitions. Not sure what I'd take out though. I'm planning to pair the eventual case with a Make Noise 0-CNTRL or something similar to give me some hands on control.
Cheers,
Mat
well its all together, hard to understand it and blew a speaker all ready!
Mat, a couple comments:
ā if you are looking at DPO vs Verbos Complex vs Furthrr, may as well also consider Instruo Csl and Mindphaser. I personally love the ācomplex OSCā setup which is very west coast and to me a big change from what I experienced with lots of prior VST exposure. In other words I find that setup a breath of fresh air. DPO sounds great to me; the dual primary routing is very good and it has a fat warm musical sound to me. CSL a lot of people love but to me it sounds a lot thinner than DPO. Anyways there are some very strong modules in this set and itās worth some good comparison and consideration. And whatever the spec sheets say, man DPO really sounds great to meā¦
ā from the thread above I have to mention FSS Makrow and ADDAC 306 which are basically macro controllers in modular. I have a hunch 1,2,3 of those might be a great fit with your overall setup.
Iāll have to check out your videos!
Cheers,
Nicholas
QQ: what level Furmann conditioner do you consider good? I find their product literature nearly useless; seems to me nearly the same marketing speak is applied to their $200 units up to their $3600 unitsāI can barely discern a functional difference.
-- nickgreenberg
Until you get into the EXTREMELY high end of Furman's power conditioner line, most everything gets handled by MOVs, which are there to filter voltage spikes...which are the REAL problem here. One good high voltage transient can do loads of damage, but lots of not-so-high voltage spikes will have the same cumulative effect as a rule. In here, I use a bunch of PL-8 and PL-8plus Furmans, in addition to some recently-added M-8Lx units.
And they can even protect against Stupid User Tricks...f'rinstance, I once had to plug in my Korg MS-20 (which normally has a 2-conductor power cord) "blind", as seeing the connector in that case would've required some physically-impossible contortions. Sure enough, one prong went into the "hot" leg, but the other was against the grounded Furman case. Switch on the Furman...and POP!!!
Did that fry the MS-20 (it should've)? Nope. Instead, one of the Furman's MOV's had popped and the MS-20 blew its P/S fuse due to the improper connection. That's what you WANT to happen! One annoying fuse change (which turned into a mod of putting the fuse receptacle on the back, next to the power cord) and replaced MOV later, and all was well once more. I should also note that the mods also included changing the power cord to a more sensible 3-prong, with the cord ground going to the chassis. This not only made the unit QUIETER (definitely a big deal in original AC-powered MS-20s) but it prevented the same cord insertion problem from happening again.
For review reports of Eurorack modules, please refer to https://garfieldmodular.net/ for PDF formatted downloads
Hi Klodifokan,
Thanks a lot for the updates and extra info. Indeed, let's hope next year the modular meet and Superbooth are a bit further away from each other from a timing point of view. For me Brussels is not so far (few hours drive), much closer than Berlin (Superbooth), so I don't mind to come next year to Brussels and have a look :-) Thank you and kind regards, Garfield.
For review reports of Eurorack modules, please refer to https://garfieldmodular.net/ for PDF formatted downloads
Arturia is probably stating that the width is 88 hp because they want some airflow around the edges of the module layout. This is a perfectly valid way to keep heat buildup in the cab from becoming a problem, as overheating can damage components (caps especially) over time, alter module calibrations, screw with tuning stability, and the like.
Metropolix with the gate expander is worth considering here too.
my tunes: https://stevehand.bandcamp.com/
Hi,
Got two seeks which i am using with m303 and other roland-ish filters.
I am actually having fun but as you said the seek has some limitations.
I would love to buy a stepper but it's sold out everywhere and i was not able to find one.
I mailed a couple of time Transistor to know if they are planning to restock but i got no answers.
Anyone know if they will restock at some stage?
Thanks
Hi Garfield,
This year, the modular meet is very small.
Only 3 exhibitiors : Klavis, Joranalogue and Three Tom modular.
Because there is superbooth next week.
Maybe next year, if there are lot of people interested in this event, they'll organize something bigger.
Not just before superbooth of course.
Cheers
Merhaba!
Ćok güzel... Looking forward to the Thru Zero VCO. Please keep us updated!
Hi,
I'll ask the organizer if he can communicate on MG next year.
And you can submite them a 404 second track.
For the moment I don't have anything to submite but I think about.
Cheers
Thanks Chris. That makes perfect sense. And thanks too for the thought youāve put into this. I could never afford (or justify) a Skylab but this could be a brilliant alternative and actually have some cool extra bits too, like the echo and the logic circuits. Iāve copied your rack (so now itās a copy of a copy). Cheers, MLC, aka Mat.
Thanks for watching/listening and your kind words!
Ok- I've had both Seek and Stepper. I also live in Chicago and grew up on ACID House since the age of 8. Always have been seeking Acid and somehow ended up playing live shows with my Euroracks at 41. I use the Stepper and M303 for that sound after trying countless sequencers. The Stepper hands-down is the show killer. Its got "live", "song" and "detach" modes! The Seek is fun but lacks these. Do the Stepper. The slide is adjustable as well.
Robotmanmachine
Hi M01C,
This is a great little demo track. Lovely sounds you manage to get out of the Alkemie's Taiko.
Nice work and thanks a lot for demoing this to us, kind regards, Garfield.
For review reports of Eurorack modules, please refer to https://garfieldmodular.net/ for PDF formatted downloads
Hi Klodifokan,
Okay fair enough and thanks a lot for the additional information! I just subscribed to the newsletter. I hope I can make it for next year's event :-) Kind regards, Garfield.
For review reports of Eurorack modules, please refer to https://garfieldmodular.net/ for PDF formatted downloads
Interesting devices! Please send updates when available. Cheers!
Hi folks,
I should clarify, for the "dream voicing rig" questions above, DO assume the rig would also have enough CV, utilities etc. to operate well. In the rack above and related questions, I've included only voicing modules, so we can focus some discussion around "what constitutes great?" in Eurorack voicing setups.
I wouldn't want to be rude to anyone on the thread; your ideas and comments are certainly welcome. With that said, I will feel free to steer the conversation somewhat back towards the initial / central questions of the post.
Do we have other comments / ideas on what constitutes a "dream voicing rig"? Please consider in particular the first few postings (which offer the initiating questions and some rough constraints for our "thought experiment"). Thanks!
I think it matters. The amount of error in a hand-tweaked knob will vary over time while a decent LFO will be relatively stable over time. I think we can sense that error (if not hear it), and that error is what I think contributes to interesting sound/music. They say guitar playing is all in the fingers. Keith Richards' feel will never be as precise as Steve Vai, but I know who I'd rather listen to. Of course no one else cares, but that's what makes something interesting to me.
Barring random and chaos modules, which can be unmusical in some uses, If we all have the same precise utilities, the same LFOs, Maths, Kinks, etc., there are only so many original combinations to make an interesting sound. What ultimately differentiates any of this music then? I would say the human error is what differentiates it all. Separating into utilities-are-more-important-than-oscillators (or vice versa) "camps" sort of takes away from the OP's fun thought exercise.-- farkas
well I do agree with you - but you can always mix in a little random or chaos with other modulation
& I'd definitely rather listen to Keith play guitar than Steve Vai or any one like that
no one type of module is more important than another - but in most cases you will get more out of fewer sound sources and a decent selection of other modules, than out of more sound sources and fewer other modules
I also think it massively depends on how big your rack is - the smaller it is the easier it is to play it manually - the bigger it is the more the need for modulation - and as I said I mainly use modulation, but I also tweak things over time - but not to the extent I have seen a lot of performers - some of whom appear to be just touching knobs as opposed to actually wiggling them
a lot of the time I have the modular running whilst I do other things - so it's difficult to tweak constantly
"some of the best base-level info to remember can be found in Jim's sigfile" @Lugia
Utility modules are the dull polish that makes the shiny modules actually shine!!!
sound sources < sound modifiers < modulation sources < utilities
think Iād prefer the sound of Mimeophon to Echophon - was there a reason you chose that? Also, what do you think the DUSG brings to the party now that there are four envelope generators? Do you see it as a second oscillator or is it there for all the other stuff it can do?
-- ModLifeCrisis
Hey ModLifeCrisis,
In terms of the Echophon I simply choose that because it fit and because it has delightfully large knobs. I think that, in terms of effects, whatever floats your boat will be just fine. Itās just that Iām personally intrigued by Echophon.
Iām sure Mimeophon, Morphagene (which you already own) or even beads would all be grand Options too.
Concerning the Dusg, theres many things it can do that Quadrax can not and because of the 4 envelopes of Quadrax you can actually use it for other stuff without running out of Modulation Sources;
-1v/O Tracking VCO
-Slew Limiting
-Filtering
Just to name a few, Iām sure thereās much much more that Iām unaware of, If you really wanāt to use itās full potential I recon you need something else to handle basic Envelopes and LFOās.
Simply consider the Krell Patch and how quick youāll be down 3 envelopes plus an LFO for Timbre Modulation, thatās Quadrax used up effectively.
Sure Pams can do LFOās and Envelopes too, but only time-synced that Iām aware of and having a module like Quadrax seems to be more intuitive and more inline with the Skylab.
All the Best
Chris
Thanks a ton! Yeah, the guitar was done with a Montreal Assembly Count to 5 and my mutant attempt to do a Bill Frisell thing. It's definitely different, and I'll probably take another run at it. I think it's a little loud in the mix, too.
The Chirper is more versatile than it at first seems and rewards continued exploration, and I can't recommend the Double Knot enough if you want your electronic music to swing. You can make a four-over-three thing cracked by inputing off-beat. So it's in time, but a really effing weird time. The DK was providing time for the Plumbutter, so it's clicks and clacks are in the same systematically off time. A Red Panda Tensor makes some pitch adjustments and further time weirdness available in stereo. I highly recommend that pedal.
Inscrumental music for prickly pears.
Love the crazy rhythms in 9721, and the guitar in Enthusiasts is way out there. Not sure Iād want to hear that after a night of heavy drinking. :-) Your Board Chirper recordings are making that thing very tempting. Cheers!
ABOUT US
Vaemi, which is an institution that develops electronic musical instruments and synthesizers, came into life in Istanbul in 2020. Founded by the brothers Efe Ćakır and TunƧ Ćakır, Vaemi aims to produce studio-quality analog devices, vacuum tube instruments and effects, logic synthesizers, small lo-fi synthesizers and utility circuits. We make our own designes, and we are working on developing a new system. While doing that, we also endeavour to revive the the instruments and circuits which are adored, and which have stayed hidden in progress from the past to the present day. In this ever-growing electronic equipment industry, we prefer through hole (DIP) technology over surface-mount technology for reasons such as its sound quality and longevity. We have our sights trained on transmitting our high quality and handmaid instruments, produced with well-selected components, to Turkey and every other country in the world for a reasonable price.
We will be releasing our Eurorack modules soon. The first eurorack module we will release will be the thruzero VCO. We hope you like it. We aim to be more active in 2022. There are 4 products that we have released before. You can visit our www.vaemi.net address to have information about these products.
Website:
https://en.vaemi.net/
https://www.instagram.com/vaemisynth/
https://www.facebook.com/Vaemisynth/
https://twitter.com/Vaemisynth
Our first instrument, El-Ma Orsted
I love it. It is a different thing though.
The Morphagene is a lovely thing but I had it for a few years and needed something fresh. If I was rich I had them both!
MNM is really good to get fast Ambient textures. Also getting random sounding stereo effects can be created fast with it. The Autoleveling function is killer.
The Nebulae is a completely different sounding modul. It is in general a bit more musical and hands on. You have pitch and speed seperate. It is perfect for glitch and IDM with the right samples and patch. The sample lenghth is longer and you can just have a USB stick full with samples without having any special naming of the files ( like in th MNM for instance 'mg1.wav, mg2.wav... ')
Another cool features are the alternate firmwares.Tschüssi ;)
-- JakoJako
Hi! Thanks for sharing.. I'm quite new about MG, I bought it two months ago from Schneidersladen, and I'm interested in what you said about " random sounding stereo effects can be created fast ".
Could you share how were you doing it?
thanks a lot
I do still find that my hands are the best CV control I've got...
-- ModLifeCrisis
Had to look up your āPerfect CV Controllerā video on YouTube, and couldnāt agree more. I was just trying to explore this idea in a different thread. Personally, I think the human side is where modular artists find their own artistic voice. I know this is a gear forum, so any discussion of style, artistry, or philosophy is quickly shut down in favor of, āJust buy XYZ module.ā I thought your video was an important consideration of something that new modular enthusiasts should ponder just as much as case size, budget, voices, and utilities. Thanks for exploring that idea. Just subscribed to your channel. :)
Also, good luck with your Skylab build.-- farkas
Hi, thanks. Yep. The more I can get my fingers and gestures involved the better. The Buchla Skylab comes with a weird keyboard thing which is a bugger to program apparently but once set up is very expressive. For this build Iām considering the MN 0-control which doesnāt do as much but would be simpler and hopefully good fun. Thanks for the subscribe too. Iād better make another video! :)
Now you really got me thinking,
This morning when I got up I looked at the build again and noticed that there are almost no VCAs.
Then I read your Post and took a look at the Skylab.I think that youād be best of trying to replicate half of the Audio Path of that thing and definetly drop one random source in favour of a quad envelope (closest Thing in Euro is probably Quadrax plus Expander) and add VCAās dedica
Also you completely omitted the Frequency Shifter.I think thats a pretty crucial one. Luckily Doepfer just put out a very reasonably priced one, yes itās a little small, but I think it would be your best bet.Now I tried to do a complete overhaul that makes sense to me, while keeping the modules as big as possible and looking at the Skylab.
I actually really dig that build, luckily I donāt have 5 grand to spend on modular right now ;).
Wish you all the Best
Chris
Hi Chris - that looks very interesting. Thanks. Iām going to have to study it. Couple of things come to mind immediately - think Iād prefer the sound of Mimeophon to Echophon - was there a reason you chose that? Also, what do you think the DUSG brings to the party now that there are four envelope generators? Do you see it as a second oscillator or is it there for all the other stuff it can do?
I do still find that my hands are the best CV control I've got...
-- ModLifeCrisis
Had to look up your āPerfect CV Controllerā video on YouTube, and couldnāt agree more. I was just trying to explore this idea in a different thread. Personally, I think the human side is where modular artists find their own artistic voice. I know this is a gear forum, so any discussion of style, artistry, or philosophy is quickly shut down in favor of, āJust buy XYZ module.ā I thought your video was an important consideration of something that new modular enthusiasts should ponder just as much as case size, budget, voices, and utilities. Thanks for exploring that idea. Just subscribed to your channel. :)
Also, good luck with your Skylab build.
Now you really got me thinking,
This morning when I got up I looked at the build again and noticed that there are almost no VCAs.
Then I read your Post and took a look at the Skylab.
I think that youād be best of trying to replicate half of the Audio Path of that thing and definetly drop one random source in favour of a quad envelope (closest Thing in Euro is probably Quadrax plus Expander) and add VCAās dedicated to modulation.
Also you completely omitted the Frequency Shifter.I think thats a pretty crucial one. Luckily Doepfer just put out a very reasonably priced one, yes itās a little small, but I think it would be your best bet.
Now I tried to do a complete overhaul that makes sense to me, while keeping the modules as big as possible and looking at the Skylab.
I actually really dig that build, luckily I donāt have 5 grand to spend on modular right now ;).
Wish you all the Best
Chris
PS: still did not Update, need to click link again.
One Last Thing,
I just remembered you did a great video on interacting with the modular by using your Hands.
The Er101 seems to be the antithesis of that, atleast to me, have you considered putting Pressure Points in there? Or have you strayed away from that Idea?
-- Cangore
Hi, yep. The ER101 does look a bit fiddly doesn't it. Part of my inspiration was to recreate the Buchla Skylab which I could never justify buying (Ā£15,000 for 10 modules) and the ER101 is the closest thing I've seen to the Buchla 251e sequencer you get in the default Skylab setup. I think I had in mind to pair my next rack with a MakeNoise O-Control or some such because I do still find that my hands are the best CV control I've got... Pressure Points would work too, but of course takes up space. I've been looking again at your revamped version of the modules I chose originally. It does make a lot more sense. I still think I'd like a complex oscillator though - the Skylab has two!
Cheers, MLC
Thanks so much for the input guys!
Agreed that sample based modules donāt have the power/capabilities for what Iām envisioning. Do you think that the hardware sampler approach could match or have any benefits over what orchestral sample libraries already offer?
Rethinking a bit, controlling the rig with modular might be fairly tedious for what I need it to do⦠What I really want is to get away for the daw format a little bit and play most of the parts in on a keyboard, but use a sequencer to have a hardware interface. Then my Eurorack is just for sound design, and maybe some audio processing after recording. Does this make sense? Or should I just stick with the standard DAW approach?
Hi,
Sorry for the late info.
I could have published it before but forget to do.
My bad.
This event will be yearly I think.
I hope so.
It happened in 2019, this year and maybe next year.
A planning can be updated :)
I'm not the organizer, just visitor.
Subscribe to the newsletter :
https://modular404.com/
Cheers