My 2 cents:
Having a moog system myself composed of 2 dfams, subharmonicon and a labyrinth, I am prone to saying that the fun with those synths is the hands on approach with the sequencers. If you say you also have an hapax, I think this system is way too "oversequenced" and I think will get unusuable rather quickly. Unless you leave everything always patched, that's a preference.
For example, I would get rid of the erica synths modules. I find 2 DFAMS to be plenty drums for any scenarios. Ofc that depends if you use them as percussion synths. I guess the hermod+ is to have more cv gate outs from the hapax. Maybe you could do with a regular midi to cv converter, save some money and some hp. The metropolix is a bit different: my purist taste would also get rid of it in order to prioritize the sequencers that are already present, but I can imagine that using it would open up the other modules in unexpected ways... mumble mumble.
The godfather is also up for questions. It took me 10 years to understand that I cannot have modules with screens/menus in my system. Whenever I get to patch them, my balls drop to the floor and I want to quit. Every patch reaches a bottleneck there eventually. But some fx are indeed mandatory... another mumble mumble
If I were you, I would build a second version of this, maintaining only the moog semimodulars, or whatever module you consider is a must, and from there incorporate utilities, mixers, vca, modulations, anything that helps you extract all the potential from your must haves. As it is, this to me seems more like a colletion of modules than a single instrument, if you get what I mean.